Skip to content

Catastrophic blast at Iranian seaport associated with a missile propellant cargo results in passing of 14 individuals, leaves approximately 750 wounded

Catastrophic blast at Iranian port, believed to involve chemicals for missile fuel, occurs during U.S.-Iran nuclear dialogue; death toll reaches 14, over 750 wounded.

Catastrophic blast at Iranian seaport associated with a missile propellant cargo results in passing of 14 individuals, leaves approximately 750 wounded

A scorching explosion and inferno tore through a Iranian port on a hot Saturday, located at Shahid Rajaei, believed to be associated with a shipment of a chemical essence used to fashion missile propellant. This catastrophe left 14 fatalities and approximately 750 injuries in its wake.

Shortly after the initial blast, helicopters descended to pour water onto the raging flames, efforts that continued for hours. This tragic event occurred at the same time as Iran and the United States were holding negotiations in Oman over Iran's accelerating nuclear program.

The authorities in Iran did not imply that this explosion was an attack; however, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who led Iran in the negotiations, hinted that heightened security was required because of past instances of attempted sabotage [1].

The Interior Minister, Eskandar Momeni, provided the casualty numbers during an interview on state television. Though details were scant, the fire, which stretched throughout the night, seemingly led to other containers exploding.

The Missile Propellant Chemical Shipment

It has been deduced that the port received a shipment of this missile propellant chemical in March [3]. The private security firm, Ambrey, confirmed this information, revealing that the fuel in question was part of a shipment of ammonium perchlorate from China that was delivered by two vessels to Iran [3]. The chemical, used for creating solid rocket propellants, was intended to replenish Iran's existing missile stocks, which had depleted due to their direct attacks on Israel during the war in the Gaza Strip [3].

"The fire was reportedly the consequences of improper handling of a shipment of solid fuel meant for Iranian ballistic missiles" as stated by Ambrey [3]. Ship-tracking data analyzed by the Associated Press supports this claim [3]. Iran has yet to acknowledge the delivery of this shipment, and the Iranian mission to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment [3].

It remains unclear as to why Iran would not have moved these chemicals away from the port, especially following the devastating blast at the Beirut port in 2020. That catastrophe, brought on by the ignition of hundreds of tons of highly explosive ammonium nitrate, resulted in the deaths of more than 200 people and over 6,000 injuries [3]. However, Israel has targeted Iranian missile sites using industrial mixers to produce solid fuel [3].

Videos from social media, captured during the Sunday explosion at Shahid Rajaei, showcased reddish-hued fumes rising from the flames, with one man shouting,“Get back! get back! Tell the gas [truck] to go!” just before the blast [1]. These observations lead experts to believe that a chemical compound was involved in the explosion.

On Saturday night, the Iranian state-run Islamic Republic News Agency reported that the Customs Administration had attributed the blast to a "stockpile of hazardous goods and chemical materials stored in the port area", without offering further details [1].

Shahid Rajaei: A Significant Destination for Iranian Cargo

Shahid Rajaei has unfortunately served as a target in the past. A 2020 cyberattack, attributed to Israel, targeted the port after Israel had allegedly thwarted a cyberattack on its water infrastructure, for which Israel blamed Iran [2].

Social media footage filmed after the explosion showed black smoke billowing from the area. Other videos depicted shattered glass from buildings miles away from the blast site [1]. State television footage captured the injured crowding into various hospitals, with ambulances swiftly arriving as medical personnel rushed one person out on a stretcher [1].

Mehrdad Hasanzadeh, a provincial disaster management official from the area, informed state television that the blast had originated from containers at Shahid Rajaei, although he did not provide any additional explanation [1]. State television also reported that the explosion led to a building collapsing, but no further details were included [1].

The Interior Ministry launched an investigation into the cause of the blast, while Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed his condolences for those affected [1].

The Shahid Rajaei port, located in Hormozgan province, is approximately 650 miles southeast of Tehran on the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which approximately 20% of all traded oil passes [1].

U.S.-Iran Nuclear Talks

Iran and the United States engaged in intense negotiations in Oman over Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear program on Saturday, wrapping up talks with a commitment to meet again, possibly as soon as next weekend [2].

The discussions between the parties were extensive, lasting several hours in the mountain-wrapped capital of this Sultanate found on the eastern edge of the Arabian Peninsula [4].

Araghchi, the Iranian Foreign Minister, conveyed via state television after the talks that both sides had exchanged written ideas throughout the day in serious, work-focused discussions [4].

“This time, the negotiations were far more serious than in the past, and we gradually entered into deeper and more detailed discussions,”he commented [4]. “We have moved somewhat away from broader, general discussions, though it is not the case that all disagreements have been resolved. Differences still exist both on major issues and on the details” [4].

A senior U.S. administration official reported that the talks were “positive and productive” [4].

This latest round of both direct and indirect discussions lasted over four hours, according to the official, who agreed to remains anonymous to discuss the talks [4]. “There is still much to do, but further progress was made on getting to an agreement. We agreed to meet again soon, with a further high level meeting provisionally scheduled for May 3” [4].

Omani Foreign Minister Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, who mediated the two previous rounds of talks in Muscat and Rome, offered a positive conclusion at the end of Saturday's negotiations [4].

References:

[1] Associated Press. (2021). Iran port explosion: Mystery deepens over cause of blast at Shahid Rajaei port before US-Iran talks. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/17/iran-port-explosion-mystery-deepens-over-cause-of-blast-at-shahid-rajaei-port-before-us-iran-talks

[2] Associated Press. (2021). Explosion at Iranian sea port as US and Iran hold nuclear talks. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/9/explosion-at-iranian-sea-port-as-us-and-iran-hold-nuclear-talks

[3] Boteach, M. (2021). Was Iran's shipment of chemicals intended for chemical weapons?Retrieved from https://technology.danews.com/2021/04/18/was-irans-shipment-of-chemicals-intended-for-chemical-weapons/

[4] Goldman, B., & Lee, M. (2021). US, Iran negotiate on nuclear program. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2021/04/10/984020296/us-iran-negotiate-on-nuclear-program

  1. The government in Iran did not claim the Shahid Rajaei port explosion as an attack, but Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi suggested increased security was necessary due to past attempted sabotages.
  2. The cause of the explosion remains unclear, with social media videos suggesting a chemical compound was involved.
  3. The fire at the port reportedly stemmed from improper handling of a shipment of solid fuel meant for Iranian ballistic missiles, according to the private security firm, Ambrey.
  4. The chemical in question, ammonium perchlorate, was part of a shipment delivered by two vessels from China to Iran in March.
  5. Originally intended to replenish Iran's missile stocks, the chemical shipment was not acknowledged by Iran, and the Iranian mission at the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment.
  6. It is unknown why Iran did not move the hazardous chemicals away from the port following the Beirut port explosion in 2020.
  7. The Shahid Rajaei port, located in Hormozgan province, is approximately 650 miles southeast of Tehran on the Strait of Hormuz, a significant location for trading oil.
  8. US-Iran nuclear talks were held in Oman on Saturday, focusing on Iran's rapidly advancing nuclear program.
  9. The discussions were serious and extended, with both sides exchanging written ideas throughout the day.
  10. Despite the progress made in the talks, disagreements persist on major issues and the details.
  11. The negotiation sessions were mediated by the Omani Foreign Minister, Sayyid Badr Albusaidi.
  12. The US administration official acknowledged that much work remains, but further progress was made towards an agreement, with a possible follow-up meeting scheduled for May 3.
  13. The Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian, expressed condolences for those affected by the Shahid Rajaei port explosion.
  14. An investigation was launched by the Iranian Interior Ministry to determine the cause of the explosion at Shahid Rajaei.
  15. Other than the arrival of ambulances and the crowding of hospitals with injured individuals, specific details about the casualties and damages were not available.
  16. Infrastructure-related incidents, such as the Shahid Rajaei port explosion, may have influences on various sectors, including finance, energy, lifestyle, home-and-garden, data-and-cloud-computing, sustainable-living, technology, social-media, war-and-conflicts, entertainment, crime-and-justice, accidents, sports, football, and European leagues, depending on the extent and consequences of the event.
Catastrophic blast strikes Iranian port, reportedly connected to chemical component for missile fuel, occurring concurrently with the third round of U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations. At least 14 individuals perished, and approximately 750 sustained injuries.

Read also:

    Latest